My Sister as a Case Study- Vallarie Perez

So I really enjoyed reading Boyd's book and I appreciated the views she decided to share about her perception of the effects of social media on young adults. I found her claims to be very plausible as is by simply comparing them to my own feelings and also to my experiences as a younger teen who regularly interacted on social media. Reading Boyd's book was refreshing, because it proved that my feelings about social media were not fundamentally based on the fact that I am a part of my own age group and that teens simply do not have the ability to think in terms of adults. Boyd entirely eliminates the validity of any such argument throughout her book and explains the prevalence of social media in the lives of teens and also assesses the reasoning behind the concerns of parents while explaining why they aren't necessarily accurate. I have a sixteen year old sister, freshly sixteen, I might add. I'm close to her and I decided to talk to her about social media and why she's so heavily engaged with it. She's very open with me so I knew the conversation would flow freely and that she wouldn't feel the need to adjust her claims, which is part of the reason I decided to talk to her about this at all. As expected, she told me exactly how she felt about the claims I relayed to her that people had made in regard to their fears about adolescent "dependency" on social media (as explained by Boyd). My sister's answers did nothing but affirm the premises upon which Boyd presented her claim. It was cool to me, to see evidence of Boyd's claims supported by someone who was so close to me, because it proves that her research was strikingly accurate. Teens just want to hang out, away from their parents, and take advantage of the option to be connected to people they feel they can relate the most to at this point in their lives- their friends.

Edited Emotions- Vallarie Perez

One of the phenomenons about social media that I find the most striking is the fact that it enables us to literally share emotions at the very moment we feel them. Everyone's logged onto one of their social media applications and been annoyed at someone they follow or are "friends" with who are engaging in some sort of emotional rant. (Despite the fact that the majority of us are probably guilty of taking part in this type of thing) I find it so strange, how social media allows us to both communicate our emotions and in turn be exposed to the emotions of others in the very moment they are experiencing them. Often times, I have found from my own experience and from perceiving the rants of others, people delete certain posts a minute or two after sharing them. It's as if social media acts as a means by which we can immediately react, whether it be out of anger or sadness or happiness, and then we're allowed to "take back" the emotion, by deleting it, which is an option we don't have in real life circumstances. In this sense, social media provides the option to "edit" our emotions, and even to delete their existence, at least if we decide that we don't want people to see them after all. Assessing this brings me to the realization that not only does social media allow people to have access to what activities you're doing, where you might be, and what you contemplated over the course of the day; but it additionally allows people to literally "get inside your head," accessing your most raw emotions and initial reactions to whatever the situation may be. Talk about reduced privacy. It is important to consider though, of course, that they can only be aware of what you allow them to know.

Heavy Books Light Analysis- Vallarie Perez

I'm guilty of wanting a lot of things that I don't necessarily need. I am a human being existing in the year 2014. That sentence alone exposes the fact that I probably value convenience over a lot of other qualities. It's embedded in our society. My point, is that I want a MacBook. I've wanted a MacBook for about three years now, and I still haven't gotten one. Since arriving to college, I noticed the amount of students that did have them, and when I looked into purchasing one, I realized, that well, I couldn't. Since then, I've resented the fact that I've had to lug the huge laptop we share as a family at home to campus when necessary. When I caught wind of this device called a "Kindle," it seemed cool, but didn't appeal to me as much as a MacBook did. The more I considered the option though, the more appealing it became, especially since it was far less expensive and I'd be able to access the required reading materials I needed for school via this device. While contemplating my options and doing some research, I thought about the "F Pattern" reading we did earlier in the term. I wondered then, does this tendency we have to scan versus read and critically analyze also carry over to and add to an even higher degree of falling victim to the "F Pattern." I do believe that a more quality analysis occurs when students are using actual textbooks as oppose to digital versions of the material, and I can't help but wonder if not only being able to access the material online, but further, implement devices as a "kindle" as main sources of information rather than turning pages in textbooks makes students even more negligent than previously hypothesized.

Where Does it End- Vallarie Perez

Saturday and Sunday mornings when I don't have work are typically spent having breakfast with my mother. I make a conscious effort when we do decide to have breakfast together to leave my cellphone upstairs in my room. The decision to routinely separate myself from my mobile device during this time with her has stemmed from my frustration with the fact that I can't help but notice that my family has the tendency to neglect the value of actual interactive conversation and has in turned compromised it for the consumption of social media. I am guilty of the same. It's ironic, isn't it, that social media has the power to in fact make us less social, at least in the settings that matter. Can you tell I'm annoyed? Anyway, I left my phone upstairs for breakfast as I typically do, and made sure to remind my mother that I wanted to talk to her about some things (and to leave the damn phone alone). Believe it or not, my parents are more glued to their phones than I am. I think it has something to do with the fact that they're only forty years old, thus, we're twenty years apart. Facebook is to them now what Myspace used to be to me when I was like ten. Practically a lifeline. They have Instagrams too. Anyway, I keep getting sidetracked. So, we were talking and down comes my younger brother from his room. He has his Iphone in his hand, and to my dismay, throws the phone on the counter, says, "watch this" and walks back up the stairs to his room. I was appalled. (My mother never objected to his behavior and I couldn't find the words to say anything to her either.) Immediately I thought about this class and Boyd's work on teens. Is this really what the exchange of opinion and simple parent-child interaction has come to? Does the generation behind my own really think it is acceptable to simply throw a phone or an opinion in someone's face via some sort of digital device and then walk away without presenting their own interpretations or asking questions about the way the person they presented it to reacted to it? It made me think about the way I want to raise my children, and what I hope I'll do my best to instill in them as well as prohibit them from doing.